Efficient Reasoning in Proper Knowledge Bases with Unknown Individuals
نویسندگان
چکیده
This work develops an approach to efficient reasoning in first-order knowledge bases with incomplete information. We build on Levesque’s proper knowledge bases approach, which supports limited incomplete knowledge in the form of a possibly infinite set of positive or negative ground facts. We propose a generalization which allows these facts to involve unknown individuals, as in the work on labeled null values in databases. Dealing with such unknown individuals has been shown to be a key feature in the database literature on data integration and data exchange. In this way, we obtain one of the most expressive first-order open-world settings for which reasoning can still be done efficiently by evaluation, as in relational databases. We show the soundness of the reasoning procedure and its completeness for queries in a certain normal form.
منابع مشابه
Efficient Reasoning in Multiagent Knowledge Bases
In many applications, agents must reason about what other agents know, whether to coordinate with them or to come out on top in a competitive situation. However in general, reasoning in a multiagent epistemic logic such as Kn has high complexity. In this paper, we look at a restricted class of knowledge bases that are sets of modal literals. We call these proper epistemic knowledge bases (PEKBs...
متن کاملNormative Systems Represented as Hybrid Knowledge Bases
Normative systems have been advocated as an effective tool to regulate interaction in multi-agent systems. Logic programming rules intuitively correspond to conditional norms, and their semantics is based on the closed world assumption, which allows default negation, often used in norms. However, there are cases where the closed world assumption is clearly not adequate, and others that require ...
متن کاملEfficient Reasoning With Consistent Proper Epistemic Knowledge Bases
Reasoning about the nested beliefs or knowledge of other agents is essential for many collaborative and competitive tasks. However, reasoning with nested belief (for example through epistemic logics) is computationally expensive. Proper Epistemic Knowledge Bases (PEKBs) address this by enforcing syntactic restrictions on the knowledge base. By compiling a PEKB and query formula into a specific ...
متن کاملComparing Answer Set Programming and Hierarchical Knowledge Bases Regarding Comprehensibility and Reasoning Efficiency in the Context of Agents
In this paper, answer set programming and hierarchical knowledge bases are compared as knowledge representation paradigms for representing agent behavior. The comparison is based on two evaluation criteria: (1) comprehensibility (i. e., how easily the represented agent behavior can be comprehended by humans) and (2) reasoning efficiency (i. e., which of the two paradigms allows agents for more ...
متن کاملProper Epistemic Knowledge Bases
Reasoning about the nested beliefs or knowledge of other agents is essential for many collaborative and competitive tasks. However, reasoning with nested belief (for example through epistemic logics) is computationally expensive. Proper Epistemic Knowledge Bases (PEKBs) address this by enforcing syntactic restrictions on the knowledge base. By compiling a PEKB and query formula into a specific ...
متن کامل